Last year, there was a disturbing trend of confrontation – some of which even became violent between condominium owners or homeowners, and their association board members. From our own back yard to across the globe, there were several instances of multi-family housing residents whose disputes were bad enough to make the news. This should be unacceptable – and more importantly – avoidable. To prevent physical altercations like these from happening, we offer the following advice: Avoid Confrontation  Remember, you’re only a board member while you are attending a board meeting, and nowhere else. When you’re walking around the halls of the community or when you are at the pool, you are not. You are not conducting board business and therefore, you don't have any obligation to respond to questions or concerns. If you are confronted by an owner outside of a board meeting, we recommend acknowledging their concern, then asking them to submit it in writing to the property manager so it may be addressed at the next board meeting.  Conflict Resolution In a homeowner’s association, before most covenant disputes can be litigated in a court of law, the owner or the association must first make a written demand for pre-suit mediation. This requires both parties to agree to a mediator and to meet and discuss a formal resolution before it turns into an expensive and time-consuming lawsuit. The job of the mediator is to facilitate a resolution that each side can live with. Absent a meditated resolution, either party may then file suit in a court of law. As for condominiums, condo owners and the association have the right to either engage in pre-suit mediation for most covenant disputes or to demand non-binding arbitration, a process more akin to litigation that is heard before an arbitrator appointed by the state agency that governs condominiums. If a party is not satisfied with the arbitrator’s decision, they may timely file a lawsuit to have the matter litigated in a court of law. When there is a dispute in an HOA between an association and a resident, the association may file a demand that the homeowner...

From time to time, an association will be confronted with the need to go into or onto an owner’s property for the purpose of undertaking required maintenance as may be authorized by the governing documents. In some instances, the association, in order to prevent further damage to other property, may need to go into a unit to remediate mold or other water damage when the owner is unavailable or refuses to provide access to the association. In either situation, however, it is not uncommon to encounter owners who are not just uncooperative but some who threaten violence. What is an association to do? First, the association must understand what rights it may have. For homeowner association communities, the Homeowner Association Act, Unlike the Condominium Act, does not have any specific statutory language governing access. In such a situation, the Board of Directors and management must look to its governing documents which almost always (especially for townhome communities) have a provision that allow for reasonable access for the association to the property to fulfill maintenance obligations. As for condominiums, Fla. Stat. 718.111(5) provides the statutory right for access to units during reasonable hours, when necessary, for the maintenance, repair, or replacement of any common elements. The statute further provides guidance on the process an association must take to access an abandoned unit. Second, except when bona fide emergency access is needed, condominiums should give the owner written notice of its need to enter the unit. If the unit is abandoned, at least two (2) days’ notice is required. For units that are not abandoned, the statute is silent on the amount of notice to be given. Absent a provision in the Declaration of Condominium, you may, for guidance, review Fla. Stat. Section 83.53(2) of Florida’s Landlord-Tenant Act which defines reasonable notice as 12 hours prior to entering between 7:30am – 8:00pm. Homeowner associations should follow similar protocols unless the governing documents provide specific notification timeframes. Understanding that an association may have access rights does not guarantee that the owner will be cooperative. In such situations, a homeowners association may serve a pre-suit...

As many of you may be aware, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act in January 2021. The intent of this law is to assist in combatting financial crime and fraud. In connection therewith, the law requires “reporting companies” to report specific information about the owners and managers of their companies to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). There has been some debate as to whether or not Condominium and Homeowner Associations are governed by this Corporate Transparency Act. The prevailing view in the industry is that unless and until the law is clarified or changed, Condominiums and HOAs are considered “reporting companies” that must submit the required information to FinCEN. This information includes the legal name, address, state of formation and taxpayer identification number(s) for the company; and the legal names, dates of birth, residential addresses and government-issued identification numbers for all of the “beneficial owners” of the entity. The Act defines “beneficial owners” as those individuals who (i) directly or indirectly, exercise substantial control over the company; or (ii) own or control at least 25% of the company’s ownership interests. The Directors and Officers of your Community Association are presumably included under the control aspects of the definition. The reporting date under the Corporate Transparency Act began on January 1, 2024, and any Community Association that was formed prior to that date will have up until January 1, 2025, to file their initial report. Any Community Association that is formed after January 1, 2024, will be required to file their initial report within thirty (30) days of their formation date. Any time there is a change to the “beneficial owners” (e.g., a director resigns, a new director is elected, a director changes her/his address), the association has 30 days to report the change to FinCEN. The penalty for failing to timely submit required reporting information to FinCEN is $500.00 per day, up to $10,000. As such, in 2024, it will be very important for Community Associations (Condominiums and Homeowners Associations) to consult with legal counsel as to their requirements and obligations under the Corporate Transparency Act, in order to meet...

Senate Bill 360 (SB 360) was signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis on April 13, 2023, immediately becoming effective upon such signing. The bill is sure to significantly impact construction defect claims in Florida. This is because it drastically reduces the time limit for property owners to file suit against builders and construction professionals for construction defects and imposes a more stringent standard for bringing a claim under the Florida Building Code. Furthermore, the bill shortens the statute of repose for construction defect claims from 10 years to 7 years. Essentially, a statute of repose is the absolute deadline by which a lawsuit can be filed, even if a cause of action hasn’t yet occurred or you don’t know you may have a claim.  The bill not only shortens the length of time from 10 to 7 years, but it also changes the events that may trigger the clock to start and changes it from the last event to occur to the first to occur. Previously, the clock started running on the latest of any of the following events: actual possession by the owner; date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy; date of abandonment of incomplete construction; or the date of completion of termination of the contract between the engineer, architect, or contractor and her/his employer. However, now, the clock begins running on the earliest of any of the following events: the date of issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy, a certificate of occupancy, or a certificate of completion; or the date of abandonment of incomplete construction. This means the length of time before building owners can be barred from bringing defect claims is shortened significantly. The bill also narrows the scope of statutory civil actions against builders for alleged violations of the Florida Building Code from any violation to a “material” violation. The bill defines a “material” violation as a Florida Building Code violation that exists within a completed building, structure, or facility which may reasonably result, or has resulted, in physical harm to a person or significant damage to the performance of a building or its systems. HB 360 Quick...

House Bill 437 (HB 437), a new law that went into effect on July 1, 2023, should be noted by any person living in a community association and every board member of a community association in Florida. With respect to condos, HB 437 adds Patriot Day to the specified days during which unit owners may display 1 portable, removable flag of the United States or one of its military branches. As for HOAs, homeowners may now display up to 2 flags representing the United States, a US military branch, Florida, a POW-MIA flag, and/or a “first responder flag”; previously, only 1 flag was statutorily permitted. The statute defines a “first responder flag” as recognizing and honoring and of the following: law enforcement officers, firefighters, paramedics, EMTs, correctional officers, 911 public safety telecommunicators, advanced practice registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, statewide urban & rescue program participants, federal law enforcement officers. Finally, HB 437 creates a new section of Chapter 720 providing that a homeowners association may not prohibit owners or their tenants from installing, displaying or storing items that are not visible from the parcel’s frontage or an adjacent parcel. HB 437 Key Factors: HB 437 amends Chapter 718 to provide for Condominium Associations that certain flags may now be flown on Patriot Day (September 11th) in addition to the existing list of holidays for which a Condominium unit owner may fly 1 portable, removable flag.HB 437 further amends Chapter 720 for Homeowners Associations to allow the flying of up to two (2) flags and expands the list of allowable flags to include “First Responder flags”. Why is HB 437 important? For Homeowners Associations, this legislation also creates a new Section of Chapter 720 to allow the installation, display and storage of items in a Homeowner’s rear yard, so long as such items are not visible from the frontage of the parcel or from an adjacent parcel. This would include the ability of a homeowner to store, place or install any items, such as boats, RV’s, and artificial turf, or any other items, so long as they are not visible...

Understanding SB 154 - Condominium and Coop Safety (Surfside Glitch Bill) Effective June 9, 2023, except as otherwise indicated herein This bill was passed in response to the surfside legislation passed last year, namely SB4D. This legislation clarifies many of the open issues and concerns that Associations were faced with after last year’s legislative session. Applies to Condominiums and Cooperatives. Milestone Inspections The legislature clarified that the requirements for the milestone inspections and structural integrity reserve studies apply only to residential Condominiums and Cooperatives, and not commercial Condominiums or Commercial Cooperatives. Note, the residential portion of a mixed use Condominium or mixed use Cooperative is subject to the milestone inspection and structural integrity reserve study requirements. The previous legislation differentiated between Condominiums and Cooperatives that were within three (3) miles of the coastline versus those that were not located within three (3) miles of a coastline. The coastline analysis has now been removed, and all condominium or cooperative buildings that are three (3) or more stories must conduct their milestone inspections within thirty (30) years of the building’s certificate of occupancy (the “30 Year Mark”), unless an earlier inspection (i.e., within twenty-five (25) years of certificate of occupancy) is justified by a local enforcement agency taking into account certain environmental factors, such as proximity to salt water. The legislature expanded who could perform the milestone inspection so that it could be performed by a “team of professionals,” with an engineer or licensed architect acting as the person responsible. The bill authorizes local enforcement agencies to extend the deadline for a building if it can be shown with good cause that the building has entered into a contract with an engineer or architect before the deadline but that the report cannot be reasonably completed prior to then. The bill specifies that the association must notify the membership of the deadline to complete a milestone inspection within 14 days of notice from the local enforcement agency that a milestone inspection is required. The bill further permits the local enforcement agency to accept a report issued by an engineer or architect that inspected the...

Understanding HB-919 - Homeowners Bill of Rights This law applies only to HOA’s and does not apply to Condominiums or Cooperatives.  This Act takes effect October 1, 2023. For all HOA notices of Board meetings, the notices now must specifically identify all agenda items for the meetings. The bill requires that where an Association collects a deposit from a member for any reason, including construction or a lease security deposit, or any other deposit, the Association must keep that deposit in a separate account from other Association funds.  Upon completion of the construction project or other reason for which the deposit was collected, the member may request an accounting from the Association, and the accounting must be provided within 7 days of the request.  Also, the Association must return any unused funds to the member within thirty (30) days after the construction project or other reason for the deposit has been completed. The bill provides that an owner’s designated mailing address is the member's property address unless the member has sent written notice to the association requesting that a different mailing address be used for all required notices. Similarly, a member's e-mail address is the e-mail address provided when the member consents in writing to receiving electronic notices unless the member has sent written notice to the association requesting that a different e-mail address be used for required notices. The bill provides that officers, directors or managers who knowingly accept a kickback or other items without consideration may be subject to monetary damages. It further provides for removal from office if charged or indicted for certain crimes such as forgery of ballots and envelopes, theft or embezzlement of Association funds, destruction of Association records, and obstruction of justice. If any such criminal charge is pending against an officer or director, such officer or director may not be appointed or elected to any position as an officer or director in any association, nor may have access to any official records of any association, except pursuant to Court Order. The bill requires developer-appointed officers and directors to annually disclose to the association their...

For many years, under HOA law (Chapter 720, Florida Statutes), there was a requirement that HOAs take nominations from the floor at their annual meeting. This put many people at disadvantage because if there was another nomination process prior to the annual meeting, people could put their name in advance and campaign for votes to the disadvantage of those who would later nominate themselves from the floor.  With condominium associations, as distinct from HOAs, you were not permitted to nominate yourself from the floor as the statute (Chapter 718, Florida Statutes) prohibits floor nominations. However, with HOAs, there was always a requirement to allow such nominations. Several years ago, Chapter 720 was amended to state that if an HOA’s election process took nominations prior to the annual meeting, you would not be required to take nominations from the floor on the date of the meeting (Section 720.306(9)(a)). The statute does not really define what it means by “election process”. Therefore, our interpretation up until recently had been that the board could adopt procedures or rules identifying an election process to take nominations prior to the annual meeting. Recently, some recent arbitration decisions ruled that the HOA’s election process must actually be spelled out in the HOA’s governing documents, such as the bylaws.  Therefore, if you are an HOA, and you wish to be able to have nominations taken prior to the annual meeting so that you are not required to take additional nominations from the floor, you must make sure that your bylaws or your governing documents spell that process out expressly, as opposed to only having board-adopted election procedures.  Since we are entering into the time of the year where many HOA’s are going through their elections, it is our recommendation that you consult with your HOA attorney to make sure that your governing documents and your election materials have a pre-call for candidates. If it is not, we recommend that you amend your documents to confirm that your election process is run in accordance with Chapter 720 and with your HOA documents moving forward. Steven G. Rappaport is a...

As community association attorneys, one of the problems we face quite often with our association clients is how to prevent violations of the governing documents and rules of the communities. How do we prevent the homeowner from painting their house pink? How do we prevent people from hanging towels outside on the common element rails and doing other things that really are violations of the rules and regulations and the governing documents? And what a lot of board members and managers don't realize is that associations are sort of mini-democracies. What does that mean, exactly? There's a certain level of “due process” that associations must follow if they're going to fine somebody or if they're going to suspend somebody’s right to use the pool, or their right to use the tennis court. And one of the things that's common among both the Condominium Act and the Homeowners Association Act, is the fact that an association must establish a committee of non-board member owners who will hear complaints that the board has imposed regarding violations of the governing documents. This group serves as an independent body that decides whether they're going to uphold or approve the board's actions and decisions in relation to imposing fines and suspensions. Furthermore, both Acts require that the owner who was in violation and subject to a board-levied fine or suspension be provided with at least 14 days’ notice as well as the opportunity to be heard before this committee to present their case. This gives the person in violation a chance to present their opinion and present their evidence of why they think that the fine and the suspension should not be imposed. Only then, when it's all said and done, can the committee ultimately decide whether to approve or reject the fine or suspension. What we often face as association lawyers are situations where perhaps that procedure wasn't followed, where a board or managers just decided that this person violated the governing documents, and the violating party all of a sudden has a $1,000 fine on their account. When they come to us to try...